Abortion Amendment in Health Insurance Flashpoint debate. Once again.

Abortion Amendment in Health Insurance Flashpoint debate. Once again. -

Concessions on abortion coverage were essential to the passage of the House for their insurance bill Saturday disease. But these concessions are not sitting well with many Democrats, including two of the main contenders for the seat of Ted Kennedy. The two leaders Attorney General Martha Coakley and Michael E. Capuano representative voted against the bill in response to the Stupak-Pitts Amendment which prohibits federal plans to cover abortions.

"To pretend that now the House passed this bill is real progress - it is at the expense of women's access to reproductive rights," said Coakley Boston WTKK-FM radio station .

The President does not sell on the provisions of abortion in the House bill, either. "There must be some more work before reaching the point where we're not changing the status quo (on abortion)," said President Obama ABC News on Monday.

While the president is unequivocally not allow federal funds to subsidize abortion (which was banned by the Hyde Amendment in 1976), it promises to balance this "infinite women's insurance choices. "

This question turns gray very quickly because the reform may affect abortion in a myriad of ways - everything that honors the Hyde Amendment -. But panoramic differently in practice Unfortunately, this generates many emphasis and misleading statements from both sides. It's probably create much more controversial than it should, but certainly understandable since abortion is an emotionally wrought question.

Even the White House acknowledges the sensitivity of the issue. They were quick to point out that this draft healthcare bill, not a bill on abortion.

for good ventilation sober resourcefulness details the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, we recommend Politifact discussion of the question.

Tweet